All posts by Cecil Burch

Video – Retention Shooting

It has become far more popular for a lot of instructors to teach shooting at contact or entangled distances. I am seeing it crop up again and again with new courses popping up all the time.

I am all for this, with the caveat that the instructor has actually put the work in. Rather than just show something that they have given little thought or effort to in order to appear that they are “cutting edge”, or that they have spent zero time exploring in force-on-force scenarios against role players that have the freedom to act as bad guys truly act, as long as the instructor has done the work, I will support them 100%.

Unfortunately, that effort into doing the work is generally overlooked, and replaced with the “well, I have been teaching shooting for 40 years” or “I have been LE for 40 years” or “I was a SOF face shooter in Dirkadirkastan” and they teach incredibly sub-optimal techniques. This area demands as much thought and effort and study as trying to get a sub second draw, or shooting B8s at 25 yards, and anything less is doing the students a complete disservice, and arguably is unethical.

And just having certain components at a high level – i.e. the instructor is an excellent shooter, or is a BJJ black belt – does not meant they will get it. Shooting in an entanglement is its own thing, and requires that the instructor has put time into it, nit just the individual pieces. A couple of years ago, there was a video from two top black belts, both with direct ties to the founders of the art, showing how to shoot at contact. It was atrocious, mostly because while they both are undoubtedly better at BJJ than I am, they have never been shooters. They live in an area where they cannot carry as a private citizen, and have never been in LE or the military, so they have no clue about shooting, which means they have no clue about shooing in an entanglement.

Here is a video showing some explanation of a couple of crucial things to deal with in retention shooting. If an instructor ignores these, than I submit he has not done the work.

Why I Am Not Using a Red Dot: A Meditation on Chasing the Margins

Recently, I made a Facebook post concerning a shooting session I had where I shot poorly. I was frustrated because I shot far below what I know to be my demonstrated performance minimums and I expressed that frustration by ranting about myself online. A large number of friends reached out to me, either through comments on that post, or even by private message in an attempt to help me solve the problem. I am deeply humbled that so many folks would take time to do so, and I appreciate everyone who did. Thank you.

What they all were suggesting was that I put a red dot optic on my carry pistol, and they all felt it would take care of any shooting problems. Not to sound ungrateful, but I am rejecting that advice (for now), not to flat out ignore it, but for a very specific and needed reason – the red dot, while it will allow me to shoot better, will not permanently solve the issues I have.

I have two very specific problems, and I think it is far better to deal with them through software (built up skill and effort) rather than hardware that solves the problem only as long as I have the hardware available, but will allow the problem to arise as soon as the hardware is not available.

My first problem is physical. Essentially, I have opposing astigmatisms in each eye. That are somewhat at war with each other, and any corrective lenses requires ad odd mix. In fact, when I wore contacts, there was literally only one single company in the world that made soft contacts to that prescription, and I had to take their prices because there was no competition. So while one eye has poor mid-range and not great close range, the other eye has less than stellar distance vision but perfectly fine view within arm’s reach. So using glasses works for everyday things (except for the fact that I have to take the glasses off to read or see the dashboard of a car) works fine, it does not give me good perspective to shoot a pistol. Wearing them, I have crystal clear view of the target, but the sights are so blurry that I am almost point shooting. Wearing progressive lenses means I have to constantly bob my head up and down to see close and far at the same time. Shooting without glasses means the front sight is sharp and distinct, and the target is blurry, but not so much that I cannot tell where the midpoint of a B8 at 25 yards is (it is tough to do that, but I can just barely do it).

One of the things that contributed to my poor recent shooting was that I knew all this, but was stupid enough to think I could somehow “fix it” this time and I wore my correctives for the first two hours of the session. Once I dumped them – as my shooting buddy and mentor Chris L. told me to do – my performance quickly moved back to where it should have been. And my FB rant was mostly yelling at myself for trying to ignore reality.

So why then don’t I take all the excellent advice from tons of friends who are suggesting that I go to a red dot knowing that? I know how to deal with the issue, and a red dot would be a good permanent fix, yes.  But it is entirely down to the second issue.

This issue I have is one that is purely the result of poor mental discipline. I eye track. For those of who are better shooters than I am and don’t have that weakness, eye tracking is when your eyes bounce from the front sight to the target in order to make sure you are getting good hits. Unfortunately, that is a good way to not get good hits! Your eye jumps before the round has left the barrel and now instead of the gun being properly aligned it points elsewhere. Mine has a tendency to go low because I look over the sights.

So the hue and cry arises. “But Cecil! That will be fixed by a red dot! So stop being obstinate and jump on board the latest tacti-cool thing.” And I cannot disagree. If all I cared about was the basic accomplishment of a task, then going to a red dot would completely eliminate the eye tracking issue since I would be essentially looking at the target the entire time.

Here is the crux of my refusal. I am not focused on accomplishing that task. The simple fact is that I can shoot well enough right now that I have no doubt that I currently posses the shooting ability to take care of 98% of any plausible violent situation in which I will need to use a firearm to defend myself. In other words, any failure in such a situation will not be the fault of my shooting performance. So what I am spending all this time on is dealing with almost an abstract pursuit down the rabbit hole of tiny fractional improvements on the existing skill set.

Don’t get me wrong either. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. My continued training in jiu-jitsu is a perfect example. Once you get to purple belt level, your grappling skills will easily handle 95+% of any H2H scenario, so putting so much time, money, blood, sweat, and tears into the levels past that is just either for a purely enjoyment outlook, or for competition, or, as I said, going down the rabbit hole of little things. There is nothing wrong with that because arguably that is a far more useful and productive way to spend time in our lives instead of mindlessly cruising the internet, or countless hours drinking at a sports bar watching sports ball.

However, this allows me to try to fix what I am able to with my shooting performance through software instead of hardware, without risking a failure to perform when I need to. Will I go to a red dot sooner than later? Almost certainly. But I don’t feel like I need to do it RIGHT NOW.

Again, thank you to all that reached out. I hope this explains why I am not taking all that good advice for the moment.

a narrow view

One of the insidious problems facing those of us in the self-defense community is that far too many people have an extremely narrow view of what we face when dealing with violent criminal assault. Too many people seem to think that said assault will look a certain predictable way, and base their training plans on that assumption.

If you think I am exaggerating, then let me repeat some clichés that get tossed around in the training community to prove it.

“The gunfight will be 3 rounds at 3 yards and last no longer than 3 seconds”. This is a popular one. People love to repeat this one, and use it to justify their own level of competence. The problem is that these numbers are an average at best, and what seems to be lost is that an average is just a line that is even between all the results (pedantically speaking, that is actually a median, but everyone tends to think of average this way regardless). Which means that there is an equal number of instances where the numbers are greater than 3 – longer distance, more rounds, and longer time, as well as an equal number of scenarios where they are less – i.e. closer than 3 yards, less than 3 rounds and shorter time than 3 seconds. And that there are very, very few instances that actually take place at that mid-line result, which means if you are training to that standard, it will almost never arise!

Another one in particular that annoys me badly is this: “All fights start on your feet”. This was created and has taken on a life because of the pushback to the demonstrated real world success of grappling. It serves to make those who cannot grapple and are not willing to put their ego aside to get some training in it feel better and smug about not grappling.  It sounds reasonable at first. Except for the salient fact that no, in all actuality, not all fights start on your feet. Many, many of them begin elsewhere. We can easily search for documented incidents, including videos where violent situations begin in a car or a bus, or a restaurant booth, or a barstool, an airplane seat, or even when the victim is lying down. To make the huge assumption that all attacks will only begin when we are standing upright is to set us up for failure at the moment when we cannot afford to fail.

Take a look at this bus driver. Note where the fight started.

And not to let grapplers off the hook – they don’t get a free pass. They can be susceptible to this as well. The one that is particularly egregious is the “well, I know that move (something inverted or a guard pull or something along those lines) is fine for competition and training but it is not a street move”. Again, this is a false assumption that the attack will be starting on our feet in a wide open parking lot by someone who looks like a bad guy that we see coming from 50 yards away. There are those, sure, but far more are the ones that don’t fit there. Just as I talked about above where you are an Uber driver and your passenger decides to assault you for your Iphone that is prominently displayed on the dashboard, or the bus driver attacked while in the driver’s seat. Guess what? Inverted moves where you are in a 360 degree environment and can put your feet on seats and dashboards and car roofs make those moves incredibly effective and useful. Or the insipid advice to never pull guard. What if the attack happens on a icy or rain slicked surface? Ever tried to maintain footing there? You know where you will probably end up anyway? You guessed it. The ground. Where you would have been in a far stronger and more aggressive position if you and pulled guard (and no, this is not me telling everyone to pull guard in a streetfight every time. It is a contextual reason why it may very well be a really smart tactic, not a universal one).

To sum up, don’t assume how your fight is going to look. Take a realistic view of how fights may plausibly look, and prepare accordingly. Don’t settle for platitudes that accomplish nothing.

Just Start

For those of us who are all about being a multi-disciplinary thinking tactician and one who is truly prepared for whatever life throws at us, we need to deal with a great deal of information and material. One of the things I talk about a lot, both in writing, teaching, and being interviewed on podcasts is something that keeps coming up by people emailing or messaging me. It is one of the most important lessons I try to emphasize, but one that gets lost in the avalanche of things we concern ourselves with in this lifestyle. What I try to preach, again and again and again, is to JUST START.

Start what? Start training! Just start something. I don’t care what it is. I get a lot of questions about the best way to start, what area should be the focus, and how to find the right training. Here’s the thing. I T DOES NOT MATTER. What matters is that you are working on something.

Should you find a BJJ academy first? Should you take a defensive shooting class? What about medical? And then we worry about health and fitness. Wait, what about the pre-fight threat containment? And on and on ad infinitum. I have even contributed to it by writing different articles on my blog about specific pathways you can take when studying unarmed fighting methods.

It is easy to develop paralysis by analysis. We get so stressed about finding the perfect path. We hem and haw and waste time.

Stop the wasted time. Pick something you can do right now, and begin walking the path. It may be joining a jiu-jitsu school, or buying a kettlebell. It may be signing up for coursework with Craig Douglas or William April or an OC class with Chuck Haggard. Perhaps Tom Givens is doing one of his Intensive Pistol Skills courses (probably my single favorite class Tom teaches and the one I think is truly indispensible for the private citizen) within reasonable distance. Or you saw the Red Cross has their one day first aid/CPR/AED class coming up close to your house. I don’t care. And I don’t care which one you do first. Just do something.

The path only truly begins when you take the initial step. JUST START. NOW.

Close Contact Handgun MArch 20-21, Casa Grande, AZ

When assaults begin, they typically begin quickly and at close range. Close Contact Handgun focuses on verbal and physical de-escalation and avoidance. This course also incorporates close quarters shooting concepts with both live fire on static targets and force-on-force with UTM guns against competitive, non-compliant targets with free will and initiative. This course begins with an evening session, non-live fire, and continues the following day with the range session.

This could very well be the most useful on a daily basis course I do. This class teaches you how to NOT get entangled, how to NOT have to go hands on, and how NOT to inappropriately use a firearm to defend yourself. This is not “fight club” and you will not get physically involved. Everything is geared to either defusing the situation and escaping from a potential hostile encounter or maintain distance so that the handgun can be used to it’s best capability.

The main prerequisite is that you have good safe gun handling skills, and you can work from a holster. Other than that, come as you are and get some learning on!

We can’t always use our defensive pistols in the optimum way we would like. Sometimes, we are able to shoot at extended range, but too often we need to shoot at closer distances. Sometimes, even when in actual physical contact with an assailant. Most people do not realize how easy it is for a bad guy to get too close to you, and how easy it is for him to interfere with your use of a firearm. This critical skill set requires specific training to optimize our chance of success and survival, and this course helps to accomplish that.

In this class we will look at ways to maintain distance, using verbalization, footwork, positioning, and awareness to keep distance from an aggressive criminal, and to utilize the pistol in a manner in which we can prevent him from stopping us. The focus is on NOT getting entangled and having to get into a physical fight, but rather to use the pistol the way it is intended to be used – at a distance.

We will cover:

Maintaining Spatial Relationship
Functional Footwork
Proper Verbalization
Presenting the pistol through an appropriate line of extension and compression
Live fire through extension and compression
Retention Shooting (both from the thumb-pectoral and the compressed high ready)
Live fire retention shooting
Integrating Verbals with everything else
Recognizing when it is appropriate to go to the gun and when not to

We will be working live fire on the range, as well as drilling concepts with blue guns. At the end we will pressure test our new skills in Force-on-force scenarios against resisting opponents with opposing will and freedom of action using UTM marking cartridges. We will be working in open space, in and around vehicles, and inside structures.

Students will need a suitable carry pistol, at least three spare magazines, a quality holster, and 350 rounds of ammo. If you have training guns and training knives, please feel free to bring them.

To sign up go here:

Cost: $320

https://squareup.com/store/independencetraining/item/close-contact-handgun

Peaks, valleys, and plateaus

Training in BJJ can be tough. It is a long slog to get to where you can functionalize your actions against a truly resisting training partner or opponent. It is not really about individual technique at all. Rather, it is about mechanics, leverage, positional control, posture, base, pressure, grips, angles, and how to adjust all that on the fly. And the problem with all that is the difference between success and failure may be very close together. When the margin is so close, it can lead to a lot of frustration. That frustration can then start a downward cycle that gets you thinking you flat out suck at jiu-jitsu and that you should just give up.

Here is the antidote to that. Everyone who does jiu-jitsu feels that way at any given time! There has not been a practitioner yet that succeeds on a constant basis and never doubts themselves. That is impossible. We all feel it. All jiu-jitsu training is made up of peaks, valleys, and plateaus.

The peaks are great of course. We pull off that new pass or sweep against a tough partner and everything clicks when we roll.

The valleys suck so hard. Feeling like nothing is working, maybe to the point even that the stuff that used to work is no longer a sure thing.

I hate the plateaus the most. You don’t have the feeling of getting worse, you just feel like you are not getting better. You can do all the things you have been doing, but you can’t make that next step to actual progress. To me, this is the most frustrating place. It makes training true drudgery at times.

Every one of us will go through all of these at different times. Sometimes they will be short periods, but often they last for weeks or even months. I remember one plateau in particular after I had been a black belt for a few years. I think that particular plateau lasted almost a year. Truly awful.

How do we break this cycle and make sure we stay in the peaks? As soon as someone discovers one, we can all try it. The simple fact is, we can’t stop this. We will be in one of these areas regardless. There is no escape.

I can hear the audience moaning that I am making them depressed. So I will make it better. There is a good way to deal with the issue. What is it? Keep training! Just show up. Some days are good, some days are not, and some days are so-so. Just enjoy the time put in and the experience of being on the mat pursuing something you love with other likeminded folks, and don’t stop. The only thing to stop is expecting a particular outcome each session. Just train, don’t quit, and move forward and you will get better. Maybe not at your preferred speed, but it will happen. Just keep on keeping on.

OKC Seminar February 15/16, 2020

I am excited to announce I will be teaching in Oklahoma City February 15/16th, 2020. On Saturday, we will be working my Immediate Action Jiu-Jitsu (IAJJ) material to learn how to survive a scenario where you find yourself on the ground through no intent of your own, and what you need to do to take the fight back to the bag guy. And on Sunday, we will be doing Contact Pistol, which is all about dominating the entanglement and deploying a pistol. There is a live fire component to this course so you can get used to shooting from proper retention and through a compressed drawstroke. Then we will put that to the true pressure test in force-on-force scenarios. It will be a great weekend with the possibility of a few special guests as well. Don’t miss the shenanigans!

You can sign up for just one day, or you can do both days. They can be treated as stand alone courses.

To Register:

https://www.ptgtrainingllc.com/store…__lSNLEjqIP2qE

https://www.ptgtrainingllc.com/store…N3-UQsDvGD31Gk

Real World Application of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu in a Weapon-Based-Environment

Contrary to popular belief, many empty hand fights and those involving weapons, end up on the ground. No amount of pontificating or self-proclaimed “expert“posturing will change this simple fact. If you ignore this reality, you may very well find yourself in a situation you cannot handle with disastrous consequences. This course is designed to give the layman a realistic and functional set of concepts, techniques, methodologies, training drills and experiences that will prepare them for a worst case “ground-fight” scenario. All techniques and concepts are high percentile applications which span a wide spectrum of confrontations. Training consists of presentation, drilling and Force-On-Force evolutions providing attendees with immediate feedback regarding the efficacy of the skills learned. The goal of this course is not to create a “ground fighter” or grappler. The objective is to provide attendees who have limited training time and resources with solid ground survival and escape fundamentals geared toward the increasingly violent weapon based environments they may live, work and/or travel within. And all techniques/concepts are from Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and are combat proven over the past 80 years by thousands of practitioners, including the U.S. Army.

These methods are for everyone regardless of physical condition – young, old, male, female, athlete or not – You DO NOT have to be a professional fighter to perform at a functional level. This will be a class about physical training, but it is NOT boot camp. Participants may go at the pace that is comfortable for them, while trying to push the envelope of their own individual performance.
Requirements : Loose, comfortable but durable clothes, mouthpiece, cup, notebook, and an open mind

The course is divided into modules that address specific situations. Seminars/training can be customized to fit your needs by arranging for the appropriate modules to be covered. Among the topics covered by the modules include:
-Surviving/defending/escaping when you are on the ground underneath an attacker
-Surviving/defending/escaping when you are on the ground and your opponent is standing
-Functional methods of getting back to your feet
-Countering takedowns and remaining on your feet
-IFWA (in-fight weapon access)
-Denying your opponent’s weapon access – understanding technique, positional hierarchy AND timing
-Multiple opponents – realistically maximizing your chances
-Surviving inside the guard
-Proper usage of the guard to win/escape
-Defending against punches, elbow strikes, stomps, kicks, etc…
-Proper role of “dirty tactics”
-Essential training principles, methods, & drills
-How these concepts & techniques remain true with or without weapon involvement
-Learning to deal with the most common MMA attacks and holds
-Recognizing and defending against common submissions (guillotine, rear naked choke, triangle, arm bar, etc.)
-Structuring and balancing your training and integrating it into a busy real world lifestyle

Contact Pistol
Effective Handgun Use in the Clinch

Ideally, should we have to use our Defensive Handgun to protect ourselves or our loved ones, we will be able to use it at an extended range, in the way it is designed to be used. Unfortunately, ideal and the real world rarely meet up. Oftentimes, we will be in contact – or extremely close to being in contact – with our assailant, and we will need supporting hand-to-hand skills to allow us to use our pistol. The Contact Pistol course is designed to give the layman a realistic and functional set of concepts, techniques, methodologies, training drills and experiences that will prepare them for a worst case combined handgun and H2H scenario. All techniques and concepts are high percentile applications which span a wide spectrum of confrontations. Training consists of presentation, drilling and Force-On-Force evolutions providing attendees with immediate feedback regarding the efficacy of the skills learned. The goal of this course is not to create a professional boxer or MMA competitor. The objective is to provide attendees who have limited training time and resources with solid fundamentals geared toward the increasingly violent weapon based environments they may live, work and/or travel within.

• These methods are for everyone regardless of physical condition – young, old, male, female, athlete or not – You DO NOT have to be a professional fighter to perform at a functional level. This will be a class about physical training, but it is NOT boot camp. Participants may go at the pace that is comfortable for them, while trying to push the envelope of their own individual performance.
• Requirements: loose, comfortable but durable clothes, mouthpiece, cup, notebook, and an open mind. One duty/carry appropriate handgun, good belt and holster, one spare mag carrier, at least 3 spare magazines, and all needed eye and ear protection. Boxing or MMA gloves are strongly encouraged, but are not mandatory. An inert handgun trainer is also strongly suggested.
Among the topics covered by the modules include:
Why & How to use clinch skills in a WBE
Underlying Concepts and Mindset for use
Dealing with the Sucker Punch / Ambush
The Default Cover
Transitioning to and Regaining the Initiative
Fundamentals of the Clinch/Safely Entering
Controlling the Entanglement
Individual & Partner Drills
Gradual introduction and immersion into sparring
Fighting at Close Quarters; attached and unattached
Retention Shooting, pistol drawstroke optimized for both distance and compressed space conditions, shooting through an appropriate line of extension/compression based on proximity of threat
Disengaging from the clinch
Safely gaining distance for escape, weapons access, or orientation reset
Keeping the Fight standing, realistically defending the takedown
Performance Coaching and Troubleshooting
Insights and Suggestions for Solo Training
Tips and pointers on how to train the material with the limitations of a real world lifestyle

The Hail mary as an option

The “Hail Mary” pass in football is one of the most exciting moments in sports. When there is no time left on the clock, and your team is down by more than a field goal, and the Quarterback throws that ball up high, and your receiver comes down with it in the middle of a pack, that moment may be the epitome of why we watch sports.

This video is a perfect crystallization of the moment and why it is so exciting. I actually saw this live as a young kid. I grew up a Cowboys fan and I was watching this on TV, and when Pearson snagged it, you would think from my (and probably every other Cowboy fan in existence) reaction that the “Boys had already won the Super Bowl, rather than just got the chance to go to it”.

The problem is, that in the excitement of the success, and the water cooler talk that follows for weeks after, we forget one little thing – that the Hail Mary is a desperation move that fails far, far more often than it succeeds. We are so giddy from the excitement that we lose sight of that fact. Not one football team plans to use the Hail Mary play as part of their preferred game plan. It is instead a “nothing else left to do” moment.

So why do I bring that up on a website devoted to self-defense oriented issues? Because too much of the techniques and tactics in self-defense are the equivalent of the Hail Mary pass. We are going to do that cool technique that “worked” one time because it seems cool and makes us feel like John Wick, when in fact the move will fail 98% of the time. Years ago I got into a debate with fairly known instructor about the efficacy of the Superman punch. He was advocating for it as a legitimate and useful move for self-defense, and insisted that because it “worked” in MMA, that was enough proof it was good for self-defnse. So I went back and looked at the prior two years of UFC fights and I found that indeed, the superman punch worked – about 20% of the time! The rest of the time, it failed, either to do any damage or to even make contact. I used that info in the debate because it makes exactly zero sense to try to train a technique that only works two out of ten times when it is performed by a professional athlete at the peak of fighting condition, when none of us fit that description because it will work even more poorly for us lesser mortals. Yes, when it lands, it is spectacular, and makes us feel awesome. I am far more concerned about all the times it does not land, because that is where most of us will be most of the time.

Unfortunately, this type of thinking is too prevalent in the training community. I think, besides that it may make us feel cool when it works, that the biggest reason people like to focus on these moves is that they tend to be easier to work and train. It is much easier to plan on using an eye gouge or a hair grab or a throat punch that we only need to work for a little bit in order to be ready to fight than the alternative which is much more difficult to face up to; that this work is hard and requires a much blood, sweat, tears, and time, and that the entire way our ego is undergoing constant attack because we will realize we are not actually John Wick.

And it is not just techniques or physical action that can constitute these wishful tricks. Hardware tends to be a big go-to move for too many people. “I carry a back up gun in my pocket to deal with anyone who tries to grapple me” is an all too typical refrain, as is people looking for another trigger, or sights, or ammo to make up for a poor skill set. If our shooting is lacking, it becomes much easier to buy new gear than it is to shoot more repetitions on Dot Torture or other similar foundational drills.

The solution is that we need to focus on the things that we regular everyday folks are able to do. What are the most robust, reliable, and replicable concepts and techniques that will work in most contexts and most situations that can be trained in a reasonable amount of time.

Those are the things we can count on, not the flashy tricks.

Resolutions

I am seeing a lot of New Year resolutions posts all over the place and I think that is great. We should always be trying to make ourselves better. Here is a tip I have found that is incredibly helpful to making those resolutions become real.

Have your goal, but then write down the action plan to achieve the goal. The more steps you can take, and the more specific they are, the greater the likelihood that they become true. For example, losing weight is always a goal for so many people. But if your action plan consists of “eat better” or “cut out junk food”, I suggest that you may find implementing those things are close to impossible. The more nebulous the plan, the harder it will be to make work. On the other hand, if you have concrete plans, they become easier to follow. If you want to lose weight, an action plan that looks more like this – for the first month do this 1) one day a week do not eat starch foods, 2) eat dessert only Friday through Sunday, 3) add one serving of fresh fruit into diet once a week 4) eat one lunch a week with only a large salad – is very doable with little extra planning or need to do too much else (i.e. buy supplements or special foods, or make a special grocery trip, and throw out tons of food in your pantry).

If you are trying to get more fit, don’t try to do it all by next week. See what small but immediate step you can take today or tomorrow, and then sketch out the following steps. If you are trying to get better at an activity, don’t say “I will practice it x amount of time every day” if you have not been doing it at all. Start small, say one session a week, and then chart a very basic progression. Don’t jump in too fast or too far ahead. Make the steps the kind you can do now with little preparation.

I know some people who are reading this are thinking “but I want to do a lot right away and fix stuff”, and I understand. Here is the cool thing about the approach I have outlined. You start the small steps, and if you find yourself being able to do more, then do it! All it means is that your action plan gets done sooner than you anticipated. It is not a timeline or a plan you chain yourself to, but rather one that gets things going. We can always do more, but we first have to make sure we do something.