be more kind

The truth is, as human beings we are going to fail more often than we succeed.

Now, that failure may be a relatively minor thing – you don’t put a shopping cart back, you leave the dishes in the sink an extra day, you fail at your diet on one particular day, you don’t do your scheduled exercise program. Or it may be a more moderate one – you are short with a loved one, you cut someone off in traffic, you go out in public without a mask. Or it may even be a big one – you mentally, emotionally, or physically hurt someone even unintentionally. Whatever the case may be, we are all going to fail at it at some point. It is the nature of humanity. We want to be the best, but life has an insidious method of getting in the way.

Now, saying this is not a get out of jail free card, as if we can just move on and go “oh well, stuff happens”. Not at all. We need to pay attention to these mistakes, learn from them, and use them as an object lesson to try to prevent a re-occurrence. This is the way that we truly get better.

However, it does mean that we should not beat ourselves up anymore than is helpful to that goal of getting better. Endlessly flagellating ourselves accomplishes nothing and just diminishes our soul. I was talking to a friend recently who in my opinion was beating himself up when there was no need. He was truly and honestly trying to be better, and was too focused on the occasional lapse. I was trying to encourage him, when I realized I was doing the exact same thing at the same exact time. I had a family tragedy happen in the past few weeks, and I was torturing myself with the things and actions I felt in hindsight I did wrong in the days prior to this tragedy, and all I was doing was hurting myself to no end.

My wife has been telling me quite frequently the past five weeks that I need to be kind to myself and as often is true, she is right. We all need to exercise kindness in today’s world – kindness and empathy certainly to others, but to ourselves as well. Don’t stop trying to be better, but don’t dwell on the failures. Use them as a platform to launch yourself to be more. I know I am going to try that advice myself.

Video – MAximizing blade carry for grappling

One of the nice things about having spent decades spreading the message about best practices for fighting in the real world is that it has taken root with so many people. I know there are tons of folks doing jiujitsu who would not have otherwise if myself, or my buddies in the Shivworks Collective had been silent for the past 20 years. Likewise, we have helped people to realize the efficacy of AIWB carry for pistols, the use of OC spray, force-on-force training to truly pressure test techniques and practices, boxing/muay thai for a striking delivery system, and how useful a small fixed blade carried on the belt forward of the hips can be in an entanglement.

One of the drawbacks to that success though is that sometimes, when the information gets carried through second or third hand sources, that some of the details and nuance can get lost. One area where this is really noticeable is in knife carry and use. It can often be easy for smaller but important details to get lost. So the following video is a short guideline in why the knife is best carried in the manner we tend to advocate. It is somewhat related to why the sheath I designed for the Craig Douglas ClinchPick works the way it does, so be warned that there is a tiny bit of a sales pitch, though that is a minor part of the video. But I did want to point out that proviso.

Falling

For quite literally years and years I have been telling people that one of the single best skills we can have if we are truly interested in real world self-preservation is the ability to breakfall. It is not sexy or tacti-cool, but it is far more likely to be used and more likely to save you from harm than a firearm or H2H fighting skills. The simple fact is that everyone falls – whether that is because of slipping/tripping over something on the ground, or getting our feet tied up through bad, hasty, unthinking movement. We all have done this at some time, and some of us have done it a lot. Hopefully, the most negative thing we get afterwards is embarrassment or some broken skin, but all too often the consequences are much worse. For anyone who is unsure about that, look up how many times a senior citizen who falls and breaks their hip then passes away as a result.

At the beginning of my Immediate Action Jujitsu coursework, I tell people the seminar is NOT about teaching you to voluntarily go to the ground to fight. Instead, it is about when you do not intend to go to the ground but find yourself there regardless. When I ask students if that is possible and how it would be, they universally answer “after falling”, because anyone that is honest will admit everyone of us has fallen at some time in our lives. I point out that even if you do not want to go to the ground, if you have not trained specifically to stay on your feet, finding yourself under sudden surprising violent assault is not the time when your brain is going to be able to do so easily. Take this video as a case in point, as it is a perfect illustration of what I try to get across.

Does anyone think that the LEO wanted to go to the ground? Of course not. It is obvious that was unintended and totally accidental. And because it was accidental, and he was not prepared or trained for it, the single reason he did not suffer worse consequences was that the bad guy had the same reaction. If the bad guy had not fallen over the officer and had a bit more presence of mind, there is a pretty good chance the officer would have suffered major injuries from the bad guy’s knife, and perhaps even have died. The good guy was also extremely lucky that he did not suffer injuries from the fall itself such as hitting his head. Again, nothing good would have followed that.

The good guy in the above video was lucky, but I don’t really think counting on luck to save your life is the best plan. That is no different than making poor financial decisions over and over again in the hope that you will hit the lottery at some point. You need to prepare and practice for it the same exact way you practice drawing from concealment with your carry pistol.

If you are honestly interested in self-preservation, than you need to spend a solid amount of time on the things that are most likely to kill you. Having decent health ( regular physical checkups, including dental since there is a direct link between poor dental hygiene and heart attacks), not being excessively fat, eating like an adult, being a good driver, knowing CPR and how to work an AED machine and recognize the signs of a stroke, and knowing how to survive a sudden fall. None of these are sexy or can be easily accomplished by buying gear, but they mean far more to your actual well-being.

In the next article, I will talk about how we go about learning and developing the ability to breakfall.

UFC fighter vs BURGLAR

https://sports.yahoo.com/anthony-smith-ufc-light-heavyweight-nebraska-home-invasion-040914890.html

There has been a great deal of talk about this break in and attack on a professional MMA fighter. A number of people have chimed in with what they think were important points, but after reading a great deal of the posts and comments, I think three of the most key takeaways from this incident are being overlooked.

First, we have to remember that in the circles that are most likely to be paying attention to this incident that we are the outliers. Because understanding criminal violence and being prepared for it is important to perhaps the majority of folks in this community, we tend to talk in a bubble. That bubble is one in which not that many of the general public spends any time in, and gives little thought to. We may spend a lot of time thinking and even training for these things, including spending money, and blood, sweat, and effort while doing so, and trying to get ourselves mentally, emotionally, and physically prepared if we should find ourselves in the middle of this kind of situation.  The simple fact is most people don’t. Based on the story and the actual words said by the good guy here, I doubt seriously if he spent more than a minute on thinking about self-defense, and even then, it was probably in the same superficial way that the typical gun owner does. You know, the guy who goes to the gun store and buys whatever the employee says is the tactically cool gun, buys a couple of boxes of ammo, shoots some of it, and maybe goes and takes a CCW class, and that’s it. No other thought or effort to understand all the chaotic variables that may arise in a given criminal encounter. I doubt the MMA athlete here ever thought about coming into contact with someone who truly wanted to hurt him, and had some skills – whether trained or artificially chemically induced or both – and what the consequences of that would be. Every reasonably respected trainer in the firearms or self-defense training world (whether it is a Tom Givens, MAs Ayoob, Craig Douglas or a Gracie family member) has told people over and over that trying to survive a sudden violent encounter when you have never prepared for it is not the best time to start. Too many awful things may happen and trying to deal with it in the moment may cause mental overload and lockup. This event is a perfect illustration of not understanding the contextual considerations that differ from his normal and understood routine world view. Listen to his shock at how the bad guy just kept fighting. Anyone of us who think seriously about real world self preservation issues has read about any of a thousand different criminal attacks – the Jared Reston one, or Platt and Mattix’s actions in Miami , et al – would have been applying their skills in a different way, with a slightly different emphasis. This has exactly ZERO to do with “street vs sport”, and entirely down to the personal worldview of the individual. Being a combat sports athlete who spends a lot of time working his sport application under those rules had the exact same effect on this person as being a professional race car driver spending all his time on a race track has on the driver being on the day to day roads driving on the freeway or in rush hour traffic. Anyone who thinks that the reason this fight was not easier had anything to do with “sport” is just being infantile.

Second, there is a reason that a lot of us don’t really emphasize teaching much striking anymore, especially to people new to unarmed fighting. I myself spent the beginning 25 years of my martial art training and study as a striker first and foremost and most of my early seminar work was focused on teaching how to hit often, precisely, and as hard as humanly possible. I did not come into this as the “jiujitsu guy”. I became that over time when I realized the efficacy of grappling for self-defense. What I came to understand was that it was one thing to have someone who was dedicated to training a striking skill set, and was willing to put in the time and effort, but it was another thing entirely to do that with someone who was brand new to unarmed fighting, and may have physical issues (smaller, permanent injuries, lack of time to train, etc.) Striking is incredibly inconsistent and unreliable. Anyone who has spent much time training it can give example after example of hitting someone with a perfect shot and they shrug it off. Can it work? Sure, but it also fails far more often. Even with a professional fighter who spends hours every single day training, they cannot be sure that the hits will have the effect they want them to have. This is a perfect example. A trained and elite professional fighter hit a smaller non-professional time after time, and it almost completely failed. It took a lot before the struggle ended. Imagine if a 140 pound woman, whose entire training of striking had been in a weekend seminar, found herself in that situation. The ending would have been far worse.  I strongly feel it is crucial to have a working, functional knowledge of striking, because there will absolutely be times when it will be the best answer, but even then, it is completely unreliable in its effects, and you better be prepared for that eventuality. In other words, be ready for failure, and have plan B.

Third, just having a weapon, even a gun, in this situation would have meant little. The smart people in this community all make fun of the person who treats a gun as a talisman or a rabbit’s foot, and that just having it without the software behind it is foolish.  However, there were a number of comments about this situation, and sometimes made by people who I thought knew better, where some people seem to suggest that it IS a talisman and that just being there would have produced a different outcome. A number of comments were along the lines of “well, this is why you need firearms”, as if just having one available would have altered anything about this encounter. Those who have said that, I ask you to take note that a weapon WAS involved at one point – a knife – and it served no purpose, because the mindset behind was not there. He did not know what to do with it, and did not have the mindset to use the weapon in the best manner. Any hardware or gear, regardless of how super tactical it is, is meaningless without an understanding of why it should be used, and then how it should be employed. And further, I would argue that if the good guy did have the right mindset to use a weapon appropriately and correctly, it might not have mattered because then he would have used his own existing fighting skill set, which is tremendous, to end the violence much sooner regardless. This is not to dismiss the gun at all. Anyone who knows me will tell you how adamant I am that a gun is a key component of a self-defense plan, but let’s not get into the view that the presence of one would have solved this any better without extra things being present as well.

What won the fight was dominant positional control – i.e. grappling. There are different end strategies that can flow from there, but position before the finish was paramount. Striking eventually prevailed, but it only succeeded because the good guy was able to control the bad guy long enough for the hits to add up. Without that grappling component, this fight might have turned out different.

And, as a couple of people have pointed out, make no mistake that the good guy DID win. The bad guy went to the hospital, and the good guy (and all his family) walked away without any injuries and avoided any medical problem. Further, he will face no legal repercussions, either criminally, or even in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the criminal’s surviving family. Anyone who has had to deal with these things, even successfully, will tell you that they are devastating emotionally and financially. If you can win against a criminal, and never have to experience these consequences, it is certainly a fantastic win. While we may want the encounter to have ended more quickly, or more decisively, or we can critique to learn of any mistakes, do not for a moment misunderstand this for what it is – a complete and utterly successful self-defense situation where the good guy has no lasting damage, and the bad guy does. That, my friends, is a happiest of endings.

Choosing a gi

I get a lot of messages and emails asking advice on how to choose a gi for jiujitsu. In this short video, I try to give a few tips based on 30 years of figuring this out and making a ton of mistakes. Watch this and hopefully you will avoid the wasted time, effort, and money that I did.

Video – anti-grappling fallacies

If you were just learning to drive, and you wanted advice, would you turn to someone who has never driven a car before? Would you ask their opinion of driving in rush hour traffic, or on a high speed freeway if they have spent their entire life living in a small rural area where everyone walked or rode horses to get around? The answer is of course not. If they have never been in that position, what could they say that would help? Anything they say would be based on speculation, or a vague hope that things would work a certain way.

It is a goofy question, but it is pertinent, because this is all too often how we ask advice or seek knowledge when it comes to self-defense matters. If someone has never used, handled, or carried a gun – for example, if they lived in a country like Australia or Japan where gun ownership is tightly controlled, and a thing like concealed carry for a private citizen is completely unheard of, and they have never been in the military or law enforcement, what could they possibly say about firearms use? It certainly could not be based on logic or familiarity. At best, it would be a “best guess”. That is not the most intelligent way to base a technique or strategy to survive a violent criminal assault.

Similarly, a great deal of self-defense “experts” will pontificate about how to deal with grappling attacks, but they themselves have little to zero actual grappling experience! How can they believe that they have a reasonable approach if they have never done it, and if they have never truly pressure tested it? The answer is they shouldn’t believe, and moreover, they should not talk about it. If they were honorable, they would direct people to look at those who have real experience in grappling to seek answers in how to deal with such a scenario.

In the following video, I try to show how in just one single instance – in this case a rear naked choke – how the typical non-grappler advice in how to counter this technique is based on massive logical flaws. Hopefully, it will help guide people to see with better eyes and deeper critical thinking the next time they run across a non-grappler talk about “counter grappling”.

cya

Most likely everyone has heard the acronym CYA at some point. Undoubtedly it is most commonly read as “Cover Your A**”, but I prefer a different usage. Massad Ayoob, the legendary firearms trainer and expert in understanding the legal ramifications of self-defense uses it to mean “Can You Articulate”.

Essentially, it refers to the concept that whatever actions you take to defend yourself, or what equipment you may use, can you reasonably explain to a regular person why you did it and why it was necessary. When an opposing lawyer tries to get a jury to believe you are a gun nut because you had new sights put on your pistol, you need to be able to tell them that you were so concerned that you would hit the attacker only and not risk a bullet going anywhere else that you made the effort to get different and better sights even though it cost you more money, time, and effort, but it is worth it to ensure that you are responsible in your self-defense actions. That makes you intelligent and thoughtful, not a crazy nut.  If you can articulate that, then the lawyer’s attack will fail. If you can’t, then that jury may very well see you as someone who did not use a gun only to defend yourself, but someone that deserves to be behind bars.

It is not a difficult thing to do, but it does require thought beforehand. You have to have it figured out before you need it.

I like to use the same phrase and apply it to people’s choices in gear or training. I often tell folks that I am not the tactical Gestapo. I am not interested in judging what you are carrying, or what classes you take, or what battle plans you have made to deal with your own personal violence defense. It is not up to me, and frankly it does not affect me one bit. That is why I find it odd that so many people spend so much time and energy doing exactly that – criticizing other people’s choices.

What I prefer to spend my time and energy on is to make sure that all the choices that I make FOR MYSELF are ones that I can articulate out loud to someone who is not privy to my thoughts, and ensure that my reasons can stand up to that outer scrutiny. If I can achieve that, then most likely my tactics, techniques, procedures, and gear are a good choice for me. Am I putting the right amount of time into my jiu-jitsu practice? Am I doing too much? Am I focusing enough on my strength and conditioning, or my gun handling? Can I put my time to better use doing something else, or something more? With my lifestyle and the challenges I face, am I doing everything that I logically can to ensure I am covering the plausible and reasonable contingencies? If I can answer in the affirmative all the time, then I am doing the right things, even if those things don’t align with someone else’s needs and priorities.

That last point is fairly important. It may make all the sense in the world for me to carry a snubby revolver in an ankle holster at specific times during the week, and it is irrelevant if someone else thinks that would not work for them. I am focused on my needs, not anyone else. If they think that a Glock 19 fills all their requirements and there is no reason for them to not carry it, then awesome! More power to them. But that does not mean their reality applies to me in any way. I may decide that carrying a spare magazine is not a need, and someone else may think that they should always have one. Coolio. That is great, but my needs are my needs. As long as I can articulate the whys and wherefores of my choices, then it does not matter what others do.

As far as someone else’s choices, all I ask is that they can articulate the whys of their choices to the same level. If they can, then I cannot criticize it, even if their choices don’t match mine. Their fight is not mine, and my fight is not theirs, so I need to leave it alone. Conversely, if they cannot do so in a logical manner, and I can express some thoughts that are contrary to theirs, and they cannot dispute my points without resorting to name-calling, or creating a strawman, then I submit that their choices don’t hold up.

We have the responsibility to the outside world to be able to CYA. Too many people want to take our ability to protect ourselves away. Let’s not give them any extra ammunition to do so. Make good informed choices that you pressure test to ensure you are correct, and you can stand up to whatever the world throws your way.

Jiu Jitsu | pugilism | edged weapons | contact pistol