New Student Issues

One of the banes of an instructor’s existence is the less experienced or newer student who insists after being given a piece of advice or a correction, ” I’ve got it”, when the fact is they probably don’t.  This goes for the martial art side as well as the shooting side. and in fact in any endeavor or when any instructor is teaching.

I have been teaching since 1987, and at this period in my life I’ve taught over 10,000 different students and I feel pretty safe in saying that the above statement by the new student is not a willful disregard of instruction, or intentional disrespect. I believe it boils down to two separate but occasionally intertwined issues.  The first is they did not really process everything that you said, and the second is they don’t really know what their body is doing.

 What I mean when I say they did not process or internalize what you said is that less experienced students tend to be outcome-centered and are focusing on the end state. For example, in a Jiu-Jitsu submission they are focusing on the final part of the move where they can get the tap, when in reality the important steps are all the waypoints before that. They don’t realize that (because so much of the information you are giving them is brand new and probably unlike anything they have done in the past) and they are focused on the last part where they can feel like they’ve accomplished something. You see that in shooting as well where during a drill they ignore clearing the Garment, obtaining the master grip, proper presentation, getting the sights up, and smooth trigger press and just think of firing enough rounds to finish the drill. The problem is both with the Jiu-Jitsu example and the shooting example is that the end state will most likely fail because of the mistakes on the path (outcome vs process).

 I can illustrate this by looking at a classic Jiu Jitsu arm bar. Most people will focus on the final extension of stretching out the arm and getting the tap. Then they don’t understand why the tap isn’t happening. They were concentrating on the cool guy end state, and not each key step of the process until you get to the part where you can stretch the arm. In this case with an arm bar the typical mistakes are not squeezing the knees together, interlocking the feet, not bringing the heels in towards yourself, and/or not keeping weight on the opponent’s head. These are all occurring earlier in the move but are crucial for a successful execution. As somebody who’s been teaching this for 25 years I can tell you when and how the new person is going to mess up. It’s like the insurance commercial – I know a thing or two because I have seen a thing or two.

In my opinion the responsibility for this lies on the instructor. We have to ensure that the new student is focused on the process and we need to be careful and getting across the idea that each step is critical and to not rush through to the end. This is the only way the inexperienced or new student will internalize this concept, and be able to have long term success. 

The other area where the student generally messes up is in not having well developed kinesthetic awareness and proprioception. Most people are not born with a great understanding of what their body is doing and where they are in space, especially in relation to other people. The great athletes like a Jordan or an Ali generally have this and that’s one of the reasons they are referred to as phenoms. While they may have other attributes, a truly great athlete most of the time has great kinesthetic awareness and purpose. When the instructor is teaching the student it is crucial that we point out the actual physical movements and get across the idea to the student what they should be feeling as it happens until they are able to viscerally feel it for themselves. This can be a long path for many. It was for me, and I spent many years at jiujitsu stumbling along and not really improving. Not due to my Professor, but to my own inability to understand the physical movement when it needs to occur.

This is where students need to be very careful. Don’t assume that because you’ve learned a technique once or even a few times that you understand it, that you grasp it fully, and that your body is performing the physical action required. The truth is you’ve probably missed a good chunk of those, if not all. That’s not a criticism or an insult. It is just a simple truth. Almost every great instructor was right there at the beginning making the same mistakes and having the same misunderstandings. When we try to tell  the student that you are doing something wrong, don’t take it as an attack. We’re trying to help you correct it, and make you better. 

Some people reading this probably are going to take this as an elitist talking down. It is absolutely not. It does not affect me negatively if you argue with me when I am teaching, or dismiss my instruction with the “I’ve got it”, or even “well, I learned it this way”. The only person that is hurt is the student. Moreover, in this world of social media, I am trying to save you from making a dogmatic comment online that you will look back later on and be embarrassed about. A few years ago, a person argued with me on Facebook that the Americana (a BJJ arm attack) is a move fit only for white belts. This person writing this was either a white or blue belt and when I pointed out that it is one of my best submissions, and I got it all the time, he wrote that “I must not roll with good people very often”……If he ever took the time to find out who he was arguing with, I am sure he is extremely embarrassed that he wrote that for posterity, and most likely prefers to forget it ever happened. I have had those kinds of interactions for 25 years. Don’t be that guy. It is safer to assume you are wrong than to argue with someone who has depth and breadth of experience and knowledge demonstrably superior to your own.

Hopefully both newer instructors and new students gain a bit of understanding from this so we both can move forward and all get better.

Yet Another Entangled Fight

I would like one of the internet experts who insist that no private citizen will ever be involved in an entangled fight in a weapons based environment to explain this headline to me. I know we can complain about “fake news”, but this seems like it actually happened.  

Let’s look at the headline: “Arizona armed suspect storms into smoke shop and tackles armed employee”. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that is a private citizen involved in an entangled weapons fight that was not of his choosing and that was initiated by the armed bad guy who already had his weapon out and who voluntarily closed the distance onto the good guy.

Also note that the good guy was armed and had his handgun in his waistband. I can hear the people screaming now “but Cecil! If he only had good situational awareness he would have been able to get the gun out early!” What a load of crap. The guy is a clerk at a shop where people are walking in and out constantly throughout the day. Do you really think that any human being would be aware that the person coming in the door is any different than the other hundred people he sees during that day?  And keep in mind the size of the store, it’s very small. We know thanks to the Tueller Principle that an average human can cross seven yards in a second and a half. From the front door to the counter in this smoke shop it’s a lot less than 7 yards  so, even if you have a sub second draw the bad guy is still going to be on you before you have time to do anything. Unlike drills on a shooting range, you can’t have your gun out and ready to go in a moment’s notice. Try pointing your gun at every customer that walks in the door. See how that goes for you. 

 The bad guy rapidly closed the distance, made contact with the good guy and created an entanglement. Fortunately the good guy was able to fight back in a manner where he was able to get his gun out and fight back and end the situation properly and safely. My guess is that it was Pure Luck. I doubt the good guy had any particular skill set in grappling. and I can absolutely guarantee you he had put zero time into grappling with guns available. So the fact that he made it through this can only be chalked up to luck and a good fighting mindset. However, basing future survivability on luck is not a good plan. In reality, it is the height of stupidity. 

And this particular incident resonates with me because this smoke shop is just over 15 miles from my own Academy and I have regularly been in that area where this took place. So please don’t tell me these things don’t happen because they do, and if you want to keep your head in the sand that’s fine. But I have the calling to help people and I want them to stay alive and I’m not going to pretend these things never happen. We need to be prepared mentally emotionally and physically to deal with them. Wishful thinking doesn’t help. Ever. 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/armed-arizona-suspect-storms-smoke-shop-tackles-armed-employee-ends-shot-critically-injured

Oklahoma City Seminar October 22-33, 2022

I will be in OKC Oct 22-23 teaching my Close Contact Handgun course.

This class is about NOT GOING HANDS ON. It is all about how to minimize that chance. Which sounds super easy (and we have all the nice pithy phrases to give us mental comfort) but is actually incredibly difficult.

This is the fundamental base where we try to ensure that we don’t end up in an entanglement, and we can use our handgun to maximum effect. There is some very minor physical contact in the class, but it is extremely limited, making the course suitable for anyone who is looking to get their feet wet in the close range self-defense envelope.

In this class we will look at ways to maintain distance, using verbalization, footwork, positioning, and awareness to keep distance from an aggressive criminal, and to utilize the pistol in a manner in which we can prevent him from stopping us. The focus is on NOT getting entangled and having to get into a physical fight, but rather to use the pistol the way it is intended to be used – at a distance.

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/close-contact-handgun-tickets-329280375467?fbclid=IwAR3DelGo1y9XjToPdQIGsLwZ-snjcuPqoYy4PWUDcGdUrH4V2vNDLYF6qtc

Entangled Weapon Fight Once Again

And again we revisit an entangled weapons fight involving private citizens. Even though many SMEs will try to still insist that these things never happen, they do.

From Texas on September 14th. Take note that neither man is a skilled grappler but it still went to an entanglement. As a matter of fact, the gun being there made the entanglement far MORE likely rather than less. People don’t want to be shot, and if they are not paralyzed with fear, they will instinctively grab for the weapon and/or control. It is stunning to see how so many “experts” can’t grasp this fundamental concept.

Also notice that even though the older man brought the gun to the fight, the younger guy got control and took it, and could have easily used it to kill the older guy. The gun is not a magic talisman that works just because it is there. Nor does it work as an intimidator if the other guy refuses to accept the intimidation. If you cannot control the position and the actions of the other person, and they are within 4-5 yards, having control of your gun is a crapshoot.

Oklahoma City Coursework – Close Contact Handgun

I will be in OKC Oct 22-23 teaching my Close Contact Handgun course.

This class is about NOT GOING HANDS ON. It is all about how to minimize that chance. Which sounds super easy (and we have all the nice pithy phrases to give us mental comfort) but is actually incredibly difficult.

This is the fundamental base where we try to ensure that we don’t end up in an entanglement, and we can use our handgun to maximum effect. There is some very minor physical contact in the class, but it is extremely limited, making the course suitable for anyone who is looking to get their feet wet in the close range self-defense envelope.

In this class we will look at ways to maintain distance, using verbalization, footwork, positioning, and awareness to keep distance from an aggressive criminal, and to utilize the pistol in a manner in which we can prevent him from stopping us. The focus is on NOT getting entangled and having to get into a physical fight, but rather to use the pistol the way it is intended to be used – at a distance.

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/close-contact-handgun-tickets-329280375467?fbclid=IwAR3LmIhyR5K_UOhg6RbjeBQkPbZEW4NSS7MrlEXlpWQQcgZpwdXWgc7rPtQ

Yet Again – Entangled Weapons Fight

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10985233/Brazilian-couple-beats-mugger-tried-use-fake-pistol-rob-them.html

And yet again we have another video that according to many SMEs in the training community never happens. An entangled fight with weapons involving only private citizens.

This one is particularly good for a few reasons, and I post it to illustrate some interesting aspects.

  1. Note the actions of the good guy in the foreground. This is a guy who is either really lucky, or has some training. As soon as the interaction happens, he squares up to the unknown contact and pay attention to how he sets himself up to move to the guy’s back. Also, there is zero hesitation – he recognizes what is happening and that action is needed. I would love to know his story because it is picture perfect in how to deal with this.
  2. Watch how the good guy takes the robber’s back, and controls the limbs, and by doing so, he owns the weapon, not the guy who brought it to the fight. Hmm. I have seen this before. Where could it be? Oh yeah, in everything that Craig Douglas, Paul Sharp, Larry Lindenman, Chris Fry, myself, or a handful of others like John Valentine and Ben from Redbeard Combatives have been teaching all this time. Weird, it is almost like we have worked this problem…..
  3. Also ponder how this is BJJ 101 – control the position and the limbs, and you dictate what happens in the fight.
  4. Look and see where the fight goes – straight to the ground. For all those people who screech about “not going to the ground because you will get killed”, how do they answer this? Going to the ground here was an incredibly awesome end state. It allowed the good guys to completely control what the bad guy did, and it minimized the options the bad guy had to fight back. In short, going to the ground was an absolute win, and probably an easier win than if they had tried to keep the bad guy upright.
  5. The final point I would like to make is the absurdity that many people in the training community like to proselytize about – “Always carry your gun”. That sounds great, and for LE, ex-LE, .mil or .gov guys on duty it works fine. For the average person, not so much. The fact is that there are many situations where regardless of what you want to do, you cannot carry a firearm. The reason I hate this trope so much is that it essentially says the only way to defend yourself is with a gun, and facing a weapon without one is a death sentence. Well, yeah, if you have not trained it under realistic pressure, you most likely will fail. But with some training and some basic awareness and acceptance of how the world is, you can always have a chance to defend yourself. After all, you can never be disarmed of skill. Certainly carrying a firearm is good, and in an ideal world we can use it when necessary. Unfortunately, we don’t live in an ideal world. I, for one, refuse to accept that I am helpless without gun. And here is a shining example of how well that concept works for real.

New Podcast Interview

I was on the most recent Primary & Secondary podcast with Chuck Haggard and Cody from Taurus and we talked revolvers. We still have aspects of the subject to cover so there will likely be a part 2 (hopefully with DB), but there was some good stuff here as well.

Ankle Carry While Grappling

I have touched on this before, but the message is still getting lost. In the last few weeks I have seen two different articles in the gun blogosphere covering ankle carry and both amde the point this method is great if you find yourself on the ground. NO IT IS NOT. Full stop, no maybes. This is not where ankle carry shines, and in fact is the worst reason to use it.

I am pretty agnostic on how someone carries the tools that they rely on for self-defense. Mostly that stems from the fact that I’m not a narcissist, nor am I a child that thinks that my personal context and situation are the only ones that matter and that everyone’s lives are exactly like mine. I also have no need to have my own personal decisions validated by anyone else’ choices. 

 I may find a particular handgun carry method to not fit into my life at all but that does not mean that it is a poor method in and of itself. Someone else might find it to be the best fit for their lives. I try to ignore those kind of discussions on the internet where people are told in a very black and white manner on how they should conduct their personal matters and if they don’t walk in lockstep with the original commentator then they are stupid. Or poor. Or lazy et al.Who am I to assume that while I have little use for something like a shoulder holster that someone else may find great use for it and can put it to great effect. And most importantly in the great scheme of things, what they do or do not do in no way affect my life so I don’t need to put any time or effort into thinking about it.

The only issue I have in these discussions is when someone does not think through everything and has left either a positive or negative uncovered. The most glaring example for me that comes quickly to mind is the use of ankle carry for small handguns. 

Now before we go much further I would like to make it clear that I myself have a definite use for ankle carry. There are times when my own personal environment and context dictate that the most functional means to carry the handgun is on my ankle. What I’m about to discuss in no way diminishes ankle carry as a potentially beneficial tactic.

What I’m going to talk about is a very specific part of ankle carry that many people in the Firearms self-defense community will cite as a strong reason for ankle care, when in fact it is the exact opposite.

There are many times when you will hear someone give one of the justifications to carry on the ankle is that should they find themselves on the ground and in a grappling situation, they can easily reach the gun on their ankle and use that to fix the problem. From the comfort of a keyboard and with no understanding of what grappling actually entails, this sounds like a really good tactic. And even better (and possibly more importantly for some folks), it is a way to compensate for a lack of grappling skill which means that we don’t have to spend any time rolling around on the ground with other sweaty people and potentially looking less than John Wick-like.

I know this may be very appealing, however it is completely lacking any foundation in reality whatsoever. All it takes is a month or two of training Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu against a variety of training partners and you will quickly see for yourself. Any of the positions you will find yourself in whenever you don’t know anything about grappling and you were up against either someone with grappling skill or superior physical attributes ( or even worse a horrific combination of both) will graphically demonstrate this fallacy. If you’ve never put yourself in this kind of situation against someone legitimately trying to control you it is very easy to drift into Fantasyland. When you don’t know how someone is going to control you from the top you can visualize all sorts of ways to deploy firearm and have no basis in reality to support your construct. 

Please take a look at the accompanying pictures. What I would especially like to point out is that every position shown is straight out of BJJ 101. The top guy is doing nothing different or special for these pictures that he would not be doing normally at any time in any BJJ academy anywhere in the world. When I asked my demo partner to participate, I did not give him any specifics. I just told him to control me that same way he would in order to set up a finishing move such as a choke, an arm break, a shoulder dislocation, or any other kind of end state where I am either unconscious or suffering from catastrophic injury and incapacitating pain . I take the time to explain this because a ton of people will look at these illustrations and they will immediately try to rationalize them away. 

One of the ways non-grapplers attempt to minimize the usefulness of grappling in a weapons based environment is that they will say something along the lines of “BJJ guys don’t train against weapons so they will not see it coming and be totally unaware of the gun”. First of all, that is a mighty big assumption that all BJJ players do everything the same and that none of them will ever think about applying this while carrying a gun. Second of all, as you can easily see from the photos, it is irrelevant. Look at how the top guy is controlling the bottom person. In the mount depiction for instance, the top guy has the bottom guy’s back pinned solidly to the mat, and is stretching forward. Both of those prevent the bottom guy from being able to stretch his arms far enough to reach far, and with the top guy posting on his leg to strengthen the pin and choke, he blocks the bottom guy’s legs from being able to come close to the hands. Without the bottom guy having extraordinary flexibility, he is stopped from accessing the ankle gun. And, to add to the problem, desperately reaching for said gun, he does nothing to prevent the entire weight and strength of the top guy being applied against his neck. The choke will happen in 2-5 seconds at the maximum. For those who have never experienced that particular move – called an Eziquiel choke – it is excruciatingly painful in the couple of seconds of consciousness you have. I guarantee you that your ability to withstand the pain and the choke is close to non-existent. 

For the knee on belly shot, it is similar in pressure and control to the mount. In order to direct the bottom guy and to keep him in place, the top guy has to manage the arms while putting massive pressure into the bottom guy’s diaphragm. Top guy also has an easy view at everything that is going on and the freedom to move and react in any way. Even if the bottom guy can somehow manage to reach for the weapon, the top guy will see it and realize, even if he is not thinking about the gun or pays attention to that possibility, what is happening and can deal with it. And I leave it to you to decide that if the gun does come out, which of these two people is in a better place to use it? 

Finally, for the side control illustration, again take note of the top guy’s control. Bottom guy’s right arm is completely out of the game and is killed. His left arm is being underhooked which means he has little freedom to move or reach, and even if he does, the top guy is looking right towards where that gun will appear and is in a much superior place to dictate the end result. And again, the top guy even in a straight BJJ situation will look in that direction because he has to determine if he can go to a better position (i.e. mount or knee on belly) as well as seeing where he can adjust if he decides to attack the arm or neck. All standard stuff that puts him in the perfect place to deal with a weapon being deployed. None of this is being done because he knows a weapon is in play, but rather because this is how you deal with someone in BJJ. 

One possible scenario I did not illustrate but it is easy to imagine is the idea of you being on the ground and you attacker standing above you. Someone may say “there Cecil! That is where I will be able to access my ankle gun and go to work!” No, it isn’t. Take the example of the pictures and note how easy it is for the top guy to interfere or block the in-fight weapons accesss. Now extrapolate that to where he is standing above you with compelte freedom of movement plus he can see everything you are trying to do. How are possibly going to bring that gun into action without the attacker being able to stop you, or even take the gun away and use it on you?

So let’s dispense with the demonstrably incorrect argument that the grappler will be easy prey for a trained person carrying on the ankle. It won’t happen, and only serves to delude someone and leaves them defenseless should they find themselves in that situation. Gear will not fix the problem. Software (skill set) will. 

And as I said, this is not a categorical indictment of ankle carry. I have already stated I use it for myself at times. It has a definite place of purpose for many people. It has a definite place of purpose for many people. In that niche, there are not a lot of other carry options that are better. However, that does not mean it solves all problems. It may make some things worse. But there is nothing wrong with that as long as we understand the pros and cons of a particular method or concept and can plan accordingly. Fantasy does not help any of us in the world of self-defense.

Jiu Jitsu | pugilism | edged weapons | contact pistol